|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Cal
|
Post subject: Fatter on the rear cylinder? Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:37 am |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:51 am Posts: 622
|
HI, Do you guyz intentionally fatten up the jetting on the rear cylinder of a pantah as standard practice. On a street bike is that worth while? I probably wont be riding it hard enough to make it glow in the dark. Meaning, front cylinder is jetted leaner than rear as a norm?
Thanx, Clay
|
|
Top |
|
 |
618F1
|
Post subject: Re: Fatter on the rear cylinder? Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:34 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:23 am Posts: 1928
|
Well, the Pantah and F1 manuals list differences. And they seem to be necessary. From as little as 3 (say 135/138 front/rear on smaller carbs in small engines) to 10 (say 165/175 on larger ones in big engines). But don't forget to go for the tan/gray/lavender (lean is mean) look on the insulator, rather than just making everything coal black like I have seen on sooooo many heads/plugs. I find the H head tends to run rich, so sometimes down-jetting that is a good answer. Oddly, the plugs/heads on my TT900SS with 40mm Dellortos are happy at 162 on both; that with the V exhaust out the back and the carb in the breeze. If I was not so lazy I would go to 160 on them. So, there is my 2 cents worth. MikeV
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|